Trilogyometer

5 Responses to Trilogyometer

1. Colin says:

   February 11, 2009 at 3:19 pm

   Yep, that’s pretty accurate. Although they’re a bit too generous to Burton’s first BATMAN.

   That movie sucks ass.

   Reply
2. Marissa says:

   February 12, 2009 at 3:57 pm

   Hey, that’s neat. Most of them are pretty accurate except for the first Matrix (too high), the first Jurassic Park (a little too low), the third Godfather (too low), and, like Colin said, the first Batman.

   Reply
3. BKU says:

   February 12, 2009 at 4:27 pm

   I’ll argue with Back to the Future — #2 was WAY worse than the others

   Reply
4. Justin says:

   February 13, 2009 at 6:43 pm

   Love that John McClane consistency. Good thing the graphic doesn’t include number fours.

   Reply
5. Ursula says:

   February 14, 2009 at 3:14 am

   This chart perpetuates the lie that Terminator 2 was in any way, shape or form an improvement over the first film. That is a lie. A stinking lie!

   It’s a little too hard on the Matrix sequels, too. Come on, they were… not agonizing. They didn’t make you want to kill the filmmakers and then yourself. (Unlike, say, Terminator 2.)

   Reply